Re: [PATCH 1/2] firewire: annotate implicit fall through

2019-03-13 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:39 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > Mathieu, > > On 3/13/19 3:28 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > ping ? > > > > I have sent the following patch to address all these warnings in > firewire: > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1040737/ > > and, as this is being ig

Re: [PATCH 1/2] firewire: annotate implicit fall through

2019-03-13 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
Mathieu, On 3/13/19 3:28 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > ping ? > I have sent the following patch to address all these warnings in firewire: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1040737/ and, as this is being ignored, I'll add it to my tree for 5.2. Thanks -- Gustavo > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019

Re: [PATCH 1/2] firewire: annotate implicit fall through

2019-03-13 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
ping ? On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:42 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and > this place in the code produced a warning (W=1). > > In this particular case rewrote the comment to start with the string "fall > through", so as to match the

[PATCH 1/2] firewire: annotate implicit fall through

2019-01-14 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and this place in the code produced a warning (W=1). In this particular case rewrote the comment to start with the string "fall through", so as to match the regular expression expected by GCC. This commit remove the following warning