Hi Boris,
2017-05-18 16:09 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
>>
>> One question about this part.
>>
>>
>>/* If chip->ecc.size is already set, respect it. */
>>if (chip->ecc.size && step_size != chip->ecc.size)
>>continue;
>>
>> Does this make sense for nand_try_to_maximi
On Thu, 18 May 2017 15:27:11 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>
>
> 2017-05-15 20:54 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
> :
> > Hi Masahiro,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply.
> >
> > On Mon, 8 May 2017 12:40:47 +0900
> > Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Boris,
> >>
> >>
> >> 2017-04-29
Hi Boris,
2017-05-15 20:54 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Mon, 8 May 2017 12:40:47 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>>
>> 2017-04-29 1:32 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
>> :
>>
>> >> + for (setting = caps->ecc_settings; setting->s
Hi Masahiro,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Mon, 8 May 2017 12:40:47 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>
> 2017-04-29 1:32 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon
> :
>
> >> + for (setting = caps->ecc_settings; setting->step; setting++) {
> >> + /* If chip->ecc.size is already set,
Hi Boris,
2017-04-29 1:32 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon :
>> + for (setting = caps->ecc_settings; setting->step; setting++) {
>> + /* If chip->ecc.size is already set, respect it. */
>> + if (chip->ecc.size && setting->step != chip->ecc.size)
>> + cont
Hi Masahiro,
Sorry for the delay, I was busy with non-NAND/MTD stuff lately.
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:06:57 +0900
Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Each driver has been responsible for:
> - Check if ECC setting specified (mostly by DT) is valid
> - Meet the chip's required ECC strength
> - Maximize
Each driver has been responsible for:
- Check if ECC setting specified (mostly by DT) is valid
- Meet the chip's required ECC strength
- Maximize the strength when NAND_ECC_MAXIMIZE flag is set
The logic can be generalized by factoring out driver-specific
parameters. A driver provides:
-
7 matches
Mail list logo
