On Mon, 1 Feb 2021, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> > Thank you for your reply, and now I know. Before that, I saw the macro
> > from arch/mips/include/asm/regdef.h and thought it needed to be modified
> > here. But that seems have no sence.
> > Please ignore this patch.
>
> I guess that's for uapi consider
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021, at 9:12 AM, Jinyang He wrote:
> On 01/31/2021 06:38 PM, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Jinyang He wrote:
> >> CONFIG_64BIT is confusing. N32 also pass parameters by a0~a7.
> > Do we have NEW kernel build?
> > CONFIG_64BIT assumed N64 as kerne
On 01/31/2021 06:38 PM, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Jinyang He wrote:
CONFIG_64BIT is confusing. N32 also pass parameters by a0~a7.
Do we have NEW kernel build?
CONFIG_64BIT assumed N64 as kernel ABI.
-Jiaxun
Hi, Jiaxun,
Thank you for your reply, and now I know. B
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Jinyang He wrote:
> CONFIG_64BIT is confusing. N32 also pass parameters by a0~a7.
Do we have NEW kernel build?
CONFIG_64BIT assumed N64 as kernel ABI.
-Jiaxun
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinyang He
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 in
CONFIG_64BIT is confusing. N32 also pass parameters by a0~a7.
Signed-off-by: Jinyang He
---
arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S b/arch/mips/kernel/mcount.S
index cff52b2..808257a 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel
5 matches
Mail list logo