On Thursday 10 August 2017 05:30 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:11:14AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>> Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific
>> properties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
>> ---
>>
On Thursday 10 August 2017 05:30 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:11:14AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>> Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific
>> properties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
>> ---
>>
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:11:14AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific
> properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 95
> +--
> 1 file
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:11:14AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific
> properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 95
> +--
> 1 file changed, 90
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:04:45AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 August 2017 10:33 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> > On 8/1/2017 6:20 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> On 2017-08-01 07:41, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>
> >>> -Example:
> >>> +Examples:
> >>
> >> Do we really need to expand the
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:04:45AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 August 2017 10:33 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> > On 8/1/2017 6:20 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> On 2017-08-01 07:41, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>
> >>> -Example:
> >>> +Examples:
> >>
> >> Do we really need to expand the
On Wednesday 02 August 2017 10:33 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> On 8/1/2017 6:20 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 2017-08-01 07:41, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>> -Example:
>>> +Examples:
>>
>> Do we really need to expand the examples to have identical set, but with
>> power-domains?
>
> IIRC, there was a
On Wednesday 02 August 2017 10:33 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> On 8/1/2017 6:20 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 2017-08-01 07:41, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>> -Example:
>>> +Examples:
>>
>> Do we really need to expand the examples to have identical set, but with
>> power-domains?
>
> IIRC, there was a
On 8/1/2017 6:20 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-08-01 07:41, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>> Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific
>> properties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 95
On 8/1/2017 6:20 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-08-01 07:41, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>> Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific
>> properties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 95
>>
On 2017-08-01 07:41, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific
properties.
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 95 +--
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 5
On 2017-08-01 07:41, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific
properties.
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 95 +--
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific
properties.
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 95 +--
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
Update ti,edma binding documentation to reflect 66AK2G specific
properties.
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti-edma.txt | 95 +--
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
14 matches
Mail list logo