> Are you taking these soon? I've rebased on -next, but they're
> still in my local delta.
Applied to -next now, will push out later today.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang|
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Are you taking these soon? I've rebased on -next, but they're
still in my local delta.
Applied to -next now, will push out later today.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang|
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Hi Wolfram,
Are you taking these soon? I've rebased on -next, but they're
still in my local delta.
Kind regards,
Lee
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hi Wolfram,
Are you taking these soon? I've rebased on -next, but they're
still in my local delta.
Kind regards,
Lee
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
> > Documentation: Device Tree binding information for i2c-nomadik driver
> > (Documentation should go along with the code)
>
> I'm still not too sure about how this benefits anyone. You can ensure
> the documentation is placed in an adjacent patch, so it's just as easy
> to make
> > Now there is:
> > git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git preview-for-next
>
> OK from having a glimpse, I'd prefer to squash (or have squashed)
>
> i2c: nomadik: Add Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver
> i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed
> Ah, sorry. That's my fault for rushing though my ridiculously bloated post-
> vacation inbox.
:)
> > all the infos I got. Some more context would have been helpful. Is there
> > a branch somewhere with all the things collected?
>
> There will be. I'm currently just Ack collecting.
>
> In
> > > First, I'd like to have this patch squashed with "i2c: nomadik: Add
> > > Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver". I wanted to do this on
> > > my own, but the patches do not apply to 3.6-rc5 (with or without
> > > regulator removal patch from Linus)?
> >
> > I'm really not keen on
Hi,
> > First, I'd like to have this patch squashed with "i2c: nomadik: Add
> > Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver". I wanted to do this on
> > my own, but the patches do not apply to 3.6-rc5 (with or without
> > regulator removal patch from Linus)?
>
> I'm really not keen on
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:52:02PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:42:36AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > Each I2C device can be correctly probed already using Device Tree,
> > > but the sub-devices still have to
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:42:36AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Each I2C device can be correctly probed already using Device Tree,
> > but the sub-devices still have to be registered by calls to
> > i2c_register_board_info(). After this
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:42:36AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Each I2C device can be correctly probed already using Device Tree,
but the sub-devices still have to be registered by calls to
i2c_register_board_info().
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:52:02PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:42:36AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Each I2C device can be correctly probed already using Device Tree,
but the sub-devices
Hi,
First, I'd like to have this patch squashed with i2c: nomadik: Add
Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver. I wanted to do this on
my own, but the patches do not apply to 3.6-rc5 (with or without
regulator removal patch from Linus)?
I'm really not keen on squashing all my
First, I'd like to have this patch squashed with i2c: nomadik: Add
Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver. I wanted to do this on
my own, but the patches do not apply to 3.6-rc5 (with or without
regulator removal patch from Linus)?
I'm really not keen on squashing all my
Ah, sorry. That's my fault for rushing though my ridiculously bloated post-
vacation inbox.
:)
all the infos I got. Some more context would have been helpful. Is there
a branch somewhere with all the things collected?
There will be. I'm currently just Ack collecting.
In fact wait
Now there is:
git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git preview-for-next
OK from having a glimpse, I'd prefer to squash (or have squashed)
i2c: nomadik: Add Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver
i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed via Device
Documentation: Device Tree binding information for i2c-nomadik driver
(Documentation should go along with the code)
I'm still not too sure about how this benefits anyone. You can ensure
the documentation is placed in an adjacent patch, so it's just as easy
to make
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:42:36AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Each I2C device can be correctly probed already using Device Tree,
> > but the sub-devices still have to be registered by calls to
> > i2c_register_board_info(). After this
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:42:36AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Each I2C device can be correctly probed already using Device Tree,
but the sub-devices still have to be registered by calls to
i2c_register_board_info().
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> Each I2C device can be correctly probed already using Device Tree,
> but the sub-devices still have to be registered by calls to
> i2c_register_board_info(). After this patch, each sub-device can
> be registered directly from Device Tree
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Each I2C device can be correctly probed already using Device Tree,
but the sub-devices still have to be registered by calls to
i2c_register_board_info(). After this patch, each sub-device can
be registered directly from
Each I2C device can be correctly probed already using Device Tree,
but the sub-devices still have to be registered by calls to
i2c_register_board_info(). After this patch, each sub-device can
be registered directly from Device Tree instead, removing the
requirement for the aforementioned calls
Each I2C device can be correctly probed already using Device Tree,
but the sub-devices still have to be registered by calls to
i2c_register_board_info(). After this patch, each sub-device can
be registered directly from Device Tree instead, removing the
requirement for the aforementioned calls
24 matches
Mail list logo
