* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 11:57 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > Employ the new lockdep lock pinning annotation to ensure no
> > > 'accidental' lock-breaks happen with rq->lock.
> >
> > btw., could we perhaps reorder this series a bit and f
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 11:57 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Employ the new lockdep lock pinning annotation to ensure no
> > 'accidental' lock-breaks happen with rq->lock.
>
> btw., could we perhaps reorder this series a bit and first see that it
> properly
> detects t
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Employ the new lockdep lock pinning annotation to ensure no
> 'accidental' lock-breaks happen with rq->lock.
btw., could we perhaps reorder this series a bit and first see that it properly
detects the original locking bug, and then only fix the bug?
To make sure the
Employ the new lockdep lock pinning annotation to ensure no
'accidental' lock-breaks happen with rq->lock.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 42 +++---
kernel/sched/deadline.c |8
kernel/sched/fair.c | 11
4 matches
Mail list logo
