Hello.
Vitaly Bordug wrote:
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MPC834x_ITX
Erm, isn't this stuff misplaced? Is this really SoC device? I
remember seeng this in the arch/ppc/ platform code before (in the
internal tree)...
The point is to declare methods bsp, as mmio access may effectively vary
(having
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:46:46 +0400
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MPC834x_ITX
>
> Erm, isn't this stuff misplaced? Is this really SoC device? I
> remember seeng this in the arch/ppc/ platform code before (in the
> internal tree)...
The point is to declare methods bsp, as m
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
Hm, why define that prop for a node with no children?
+ interrupts = <17 8>;
+ interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 700 17 8>;
+ interrupt-map-mask = <0
Hello.
Vitaly Bordug wrote:
This updates relevant platform code
(freescale mpc8349itx target) to make the CompactFlash
work in TrueIDE mode.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It would have been good if you tried to actual
On Saturday 07 July 2007, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 01:49:00PM +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> >
> > This updates relevant platform code
> > (freescale mpc8349itx target) to make the CompactFlash
> > work in TrueIDE mode.
>
> Shouldn't you be writing a PCMCIA driver instead fo
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 01:49:00PM +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
>
> This updates relevant platform code
> (freescale mpc8349itx target) to make the CompactFlash
> work in TrueIDE mode.
Shouldn't you be writing a PCMCIA driver instead for the CF, so it
handles other devices as well? Then you get st
This updates relevant platform code
(freescale mpc8349itx target) to make the CompactFlash
work in TrueIDE mode.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts | 17 +
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_
7 matches
Mail list logo