On Sun, Oct 27 2013, Greg Thelen wrote:
> this_cpu_sub() is implemented as negation and addition.
>
> This patch casts the adjustment to the counter type before negation to
> sign extend the adjustment. This helps in cases where the counter
> type is wider than an unsigned adjustment. An
On Sun, Oct 27 2013, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 05:04:29AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo wrote:
>>
>> > We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one. How should
>> > these be routed? I can take these through percpu tree
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 05:04:29AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one. How should
> > these be routed? I can take these through percpu tree or mm works
> > too. Either way, it'd be
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo wrote:
> We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one. How should
> these be routed? I can take these through percpu tree or mm works
> too. Either way, it'd be best to route them together.
Yes, all three look like -stable material to
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:44:35AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> this_cpu_sub() is implemented as negation and addition.
>
> This patch casts the adjustment to the counter type before negation to
> sign extend the adjustment. This helps in cases where the counter
> type is wider than an unsigned
this_cpu_sub() is implemented as negation and addition.
This patch casts the adjustment to the counter type before negation to
sign extend the adjustment. This helps in cases where the counter
type is wider than an unsigned adjustment. An alternative to this
patch is to declare such operations
this_cpu_sub() is implemented as negation and addition.
This patch casts the adjustment to the counter type before negation to
sign extend the adjustment. This helps in cases where the counter
type is wider than an unsigned adjustment. An alternative to this
patch is to declare such operations
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:44:35AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
this_cpu_sub() is implemented as negation and addition.
This patch casts the adjustment to the counter type before negation to
sign extend the adjustment. This helps in cases where the counter
type is wider than an unsigned
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one. How should
these be routed? I can take these through percpu tree or mm works
too. Either way, it'd be best to route them together.
Yes, all three look like -stable
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 05:04:29AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one. How should
these be routed? I can take these through percpu tree or mm works
too. Either way, it'd
On Sun, Oct 27 2013, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 05:04:29AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one. How should
these be routed? I can take these through percpu
On Sun, Oct 27 2013, Greg Thelen wrote:
this_cpu_sub() is implemented as negation and addition.
This patch casts the adjustment to the counter type before negation to
sign extend the adjustment. This helps in cases where the counter
type is wider than an unsigned adjustment. An alternative
12 matches
Mail list logo
