On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:08:23PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
> 28/03/2013 (Thu 19:00) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > >
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
28/03/2013 (Thu 19:00) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > 2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker :
> > > [Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
29/03/2013 (Fri 01:39) Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker :
> > [Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
> > 28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) In
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker :
> > [Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
> > 28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> * Frederic Weisbecker w
2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker :
> [Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
> 28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>>
>> * Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>
>> > + cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf),
>&g
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > + cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf),
> > nohz_extended_mask);
> > + pr_info("NO_HZ:
2013/3/28 Ingo Molnar :
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
>> + cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf),
>> nohz_extended_mask);
>> + pr_info("NO_HZ: Experimental full dynticks CPUs: %s.\n", nohz_ext_buf);
>
> I'd suggest removing the 'experimental' word. We are not sending
* Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> + cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf),
> nohz_extended_mask);
> + pr_info("NO_HZ: Experimental full dynticks CPUs: %s.\n", nohz_ext_buf);
I'd suggest removing the 'experimental' word. We are not sending anything
experimental to Linus:
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
+ cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf),
nohz_extended_mask);
+ pr_info(NO_HZ: Experimental full
2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com:
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
+ cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com:
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
29/03/2013 (Fri 01:39) Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com:
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
28/03/2013 (Thu 08:40) Ingo Molnar wrote
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
28/03/2013 (Thu 19:00) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com:
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:08:23PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: [PATCH 2/4] nohz: Print final full dynticks CPUs range on boot] On
28/03/2013 (Thu 19:00) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2013/3/29 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma
* Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
+ cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf),
nohz_extended_mask);
+ pr_info(NO_HZ: Experimental full dynticks CPUs: %s.\n, nohz_ext_buf);
I'd suggest removing the 'experimental' word. We are not sending anything
2013/3/28 Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org:
* Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
+ cpulist_scnprintf(nohz_ext_buf, sizeof(nohz_ext_buf),
nohz_extended_mask);
+ pr_info(NO_HZ: Experimental full dynticks CPUs: %s.\n, nohz_ext_buf);
I'd suggest removing the 'experimental'
Given that we are applying a few restrictions on the
full dynticks CPUs range (boot CPU excluded, then
soon the RCU nocb subset requirement), let's print
the final resulting range of full dynticks CPUs to
the user so that he knows what's really going to run.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker
Given that we are applying a few restrictions on the
full dynticks CPUs range (boot CPU excluded, then
soon the RCU nocb subset requirement), let's print
the final resulting range of full dynticks CPUs to
the user so that he knows what's really going to run.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker
18 matches
Mail list logo
