Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
>Should I change that as well and move it to mce.h?
Yes please.
--
Sent from a small device: formatting sux and brevity is inevitable.
On 2/24/2016 5:33 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:56:38PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
I think MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_MISC0 would be required in mce.c as well.
So might be better to retain it here.
Actually, I'm thinking, these all are - even if used in multiple files
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:56:38PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> I think MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_MISC0 would be required in mce.c as well.
> So might be better to retain it here.
Actually, I'm thinking, these all are - even if used in multiple files
- all MCE-specific and therefore used in MCE
On 2/23/16 6:39 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:45:09PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
/* 'SMCA': AMD64 Scalable MCA */
+#define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_MISC0 0xc0002003
#define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_CONFIG 0xc0002004
#define MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MC0_IPID
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:45:09PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> In upcoming processors, the BLKPTR field is no longer used
> to indicate the MSR number of the additional register.
> Insted, it simply indicates the prescence of additional MSRs.
>
> Fixing the logic here to gather MSR addr
On 2/16/2016 3:45 PM, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
In upcoming processors, the BLKPTR field is no longer used
to indicate the MSR number of the additional register.
Insted, it simply indicates the prescence of additional MSRs.
Fixing the logic here to gather MSR address from
MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_
In upcoming processors, the BLKPTR field is no longer used
to indicate the MSR number of the additional register.
Insted, it simply indicates the prescence of additional MSRs.
Fixing the logic here to gather MSR address from
MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISC() for newer processors
and we fall back to existi
7 matches
Mail list logo
