Re: [PATCH 2/5] futex: Check for pi futex_q only once

2013-11-23 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 22:33 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 16:56 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > All wake_futex() callers already verify that the we are not dealing with > > a pi futex_q, so we can remove the redundant WARN() check, as this is never > > triggered anyway. > >

Re: [PATCH 2/5] futex: Check for pi futex_q only once

2013-11-23 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 22:33 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 16:56 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: All wake_futex() callers already verify that the we are not dealing with a pi futex_q, so we can remove the redundant WARN() check, as this is never triggered anyway. Cc:

Re: [PATCH 2/5] futex: Check for pi futex_q only once

2013-11-22 Thread Darren Hart
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 16:56 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > All wake_futex() callers already verify that the we are not dealing with > a pi futex_q, so we can remove the redundant WARN() check, as this is never > triggered anyway. > > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Darren Hart > Cc: Peter Zijlstra >

[PATCH 2/5] futex: Check for pi futex_q only once

2013-11-22 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
All wake_futex() callers already verify that the we are not dealing with a pi futex_q, so we can remove the redundant WARN() check, as this is never triggered anyway. Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Darren Hart Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Jeff Mahoney Cc: Linus

[PATCH 2/5] futex: Check for pi futex_q only once

2013-11-22 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
All wake_futex() callers already verify that the we are not dealing with a pi futex_q, so we can remove the redundant WARN() check, as this is never triggered anyway. Cc: Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org Cc: Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org Cc: Thomas

Re: [PATCH 2/5] futex: Check for pi futex_q only once

2013-11-22 Thread Darren Hart
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 16:56 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: All wake_futex() callers already verify that the we are not dealing with a pi futex_q, so we can remove the redundant WARN() check, as this is never triggered anyway. Cc: Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org Cc: Darren Hart