On 12/02/2014 09:20 AM, Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 12/02/2014 12:52 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
>> let the chips fall where they may.
>>
>> Add support for CROSS_COMPILE while we're at it. Also we don't
Hi Michael,
On 12/02/2014 12:52 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
> let the chips fall where they may.
>
> Add support for CROSS_COMPILE while we're at it. Also we don't need a
> custom rule for building kcmp_test.
>
> Signed-off-
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 10:09 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:07:14PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
> > let the chips fall where they may.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
>
> kcmp depends
Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
let the chips fall where they may.
Add support for CROSS_COMPILE while we're at it. Also we don't need a
custom rule for building kcmp_test.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
eg:
$ uname -m
x86_64
$ make ARCH=powerpc header
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 09:06 -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 10/23/2014 01:07 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
> > let the chips fall where they may.
>
> As a user of kcmp via CRIU on arm and arm64, thank
On 10/23/2014 07:52 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 07:06 AM, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On 10/23/2014 01:07 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
>>> let the chips fall where they may.
>>
>> As a user of k
On 10/23/2014 07:06 AM, Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 10/23/2014 01:07 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
>> let the chips fall where they may.
>
> As a user of kcmp via CRIU on arm and arm64, thanks!
>
>> diff
Hi Michael,
On 10/23/2014 01:07 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
> let the chips fall where they may.
As a user of kcmp via CRIU on arm and arm64, thanks!
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/Makefile
> b/tools/testing/se
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:07:14PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
> let the chips fall where they may.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
kcmp depends on checkpoint/restore config symbol which is known
to work on x86 and (i
Don't prevent the test building on non-x86. Just try and build it and
let the chips fall where they may.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/Makefile | 14 --
1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/Makefile
b/tools/tes
10 matches
Mail list logo