>>> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 19.01.08 02:28 >>>
>On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:57:27AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The drivers picked just serve as examples (which I routinely build and
>> hence am able to easily verify), i.e. as before he patch doesn't change
>> all instances where 'const' could
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19.01.08 02:28
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:57:27AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
The drivers picked just serve as examples (which I routinely build and
hence am able to easily verify), i.e. as before he patch doesn't change
all instances where 'const' could have been
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:57:27AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The drivers picked just serve as examples (which I routinely build and
> hence am able to easily verify), i.e. as before he patch doesn't change
> all instances where 'const' could have been added as a result of the
> base change, only
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:57:27AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
The drivers picked just serve as examples (which I routinely build and
hence am able to easily verify), i.e. as before he patch doesn't change
all instances where 'const' could have been added as a result of the
base change, only
The drivers picked just serve as examples (which I routinely build and
hence am able to easily verify), i.e. as before he patch doesn't change
all instances where 'const' could have been added as a result of the
base change, only where the change has a real effect (the module loader
doesn't
The drivers picked just serve as examples (which I routinely build and
hence am able to easily verify), i.e. as before he patch doesn't change
all instances where 'const' could have been added as a result of the
base change, only where the change has a real effect (the module loader
doesn't
6 matches
Mail list logo
