On Wed, 6 May 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 10:30:15AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
Will fix the whitespace issues (including before return) or other possible
coding convention issues.
It could be more of a common sense to have this in checkpatch rather that
manually ha
On Wed, 6 May 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 10:30:15AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
There's CAT in your subject, make up your minds already on what you want
to call this stuff.
We dont have control over the names.It is clear
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 10:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> But we're not implementing an umbrella right? We're implementing Cache
> QoS Enforcement (CQE aka. CAT).
>
> Why confuse things with calling it random other names?
>
> From what I understand the whole RDT thing is the umbrella term for
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 10:30:15AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> Will fix the whitespace issues (including before return) or other possible
> coding convention issues.
>
> It could be more of a common sense to have this in checkpatch rather that
> manually having to pointing out. If you want to h
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 10:30:15AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> On Sat, 2 May 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> >
> >There's CAT in your subject, make up your minds already on what you want
> >to call this stuff.
>
> We dont have control over the names.It is clear from the patch 0/7 where its
If
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
There's CAT in your subject, make up your minds already on what you want
to call this stuff.
We dont have control over the names.It is clear from the patch 0/7 where
its explained that RDT is
the umbrella term and CAT is a part of it and this patc
There's CAT in your subject, make up your minds already on what you want
to call this stuff.
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 06:36:37PM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> +static void rdt_free_closid(unsigned int clos)
> +{
> +
superfluous whitespace
> + lockdep_assert_held(&rdt_group_mutex);
> +
> +
Add support for cache bit mask manipulation. The change adds a file
cache_mask to the RDT cgroup which represents the CBM(cache bit mask)
for the cgroup.
Update to the CBM is done by writing to the IA32_L3_MASK_n.
The RDT cgroup follows cgroup hierarchy ,mkdir and adding tasks to the
cgroup neve
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:16:03PM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
Add support for cache bit mask manipulation. The change adds a file to
the RDT cgroup which represents the CBM(cache bit mask) for the cgroup.
The RDT cgroup follows cgroup hierarchy ,m
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:16:03PM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> Add support for cache bit mask manipulation. The change adds a file to
> the RDT cgroup which represents the CBM(cache bit mask) for the cgroup.
>
> The RDT cgroup follows cgroup hierarchy ,mkdir and adding tasks to the
> cgroup nev
Add support for cache bit mask manipulation. The change adds a file to
the RDT cgroup which represents the CBM(cache bit mask) for the cgroup.
The RDT cgroup follows cgroup hierarchy ,mkdir and adding tasks to the
cgroup never fails. When a child cgroup is created it inherits the
CLOSid and the C
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Vikas.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:34:16AM -0800, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
This cgroup subsystem would basically let the user partition one of the
Platform shared resource , the LLC cache. This could be extended in future
I suppose LLC means last le
Hello, Vikas.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:34:16AM -0800, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> This cgroup subsystem would basically let the user partition one of the
> Platform shared resource , the LLC cache. This could be extended in future
I suppose LLC means last level cache? It'd be great if you can spel
Hello Tejun,
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:16:40PM -0800, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
Add support for cache bit mask manipulation. The change adds a file to
the RDT cgroup which represents the CBM(cache bit mask) for the cgroup.
The RDT cgroup follows cgr
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 07:12:22AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I feel a bit underwhelmed about this new controller and its interface.
> It is evidently at a lot lower level and way more niche than what
> other controllers are doing, even cpuset. At the same time, as long
> as it's well isolated, it
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:16:40PM -0800, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> Add support for cache bit mask manipulation. The change adds a file to
> the RDT cgroup which represents the CBM(cache bit mask) for the cgroup.
>
> The RDT cgroup follows cgroup hierarchy ,mkdir and adding tasks to the
> cg
Add support for cache bit mask manipulation. The change adds a file to
the RDT cgroup which represents the CBM(cache bit mask) for the cgroup.
The RDT cgroup follows cgroup hierarchy ,mkdir and adding tasks to the
cgroup never fails. When a child cgroup is created it inherits the
CLOSid and the C
17 matches
Mail list logo
