Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] net: count hw_addr syncs so that unsync works properly.

From: Jeremy Kerr Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:02:15 +1000 > Hi all, > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply it? >>> >>> I queue up networking patches as needed and that queue is >>> visible at: >>> >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/user/bundle/2566/?sta

Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] net: count hw_addr syncs so that unsync works properly.

Hi all, >>> This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply >>> it? >> >> I queue up networking patches as needed and that queue is >> visible at: >> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/user/bundle/2566/?state=* > > Actually, this bundle is not visible via that link. It app

Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] net: count hw_addr syncs so that unsync works properly.

Hi Dave, On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:54:01 -0400 (EDT) David Miller wrote: > > From: Jonghwan Choi > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:31:44 +0900 > > > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply > > it? > > I queue up networking patches as needed and that queue is > visibl

Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] net: count hw_addr syncs so that unsync works properly.

From: Jonghwan Choi Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:31:44 +0900 > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply > it? I queue up networking patches as needed and that queue is visible at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/user/bundle/2566/?state=* and yes this patch, along wit

[PATCH 3.8-stable] net: count hw_addr syncs so that unsync works properly.

This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply it? -- From: "Vlad Yasevich " commit 4543fbefe6e06a9e40d9f2b28d688393a299f079 upstream A few drivers use dev_uc_sync/unsync to synchronize the address lists from master down to slave/lower devices. In so