Re: [PATCH 36/41] scsi: qla4xxx: ql4_os: mark expected switch fall-through

2019-01-11 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Nilesh, >>In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases >>where we are expecting to fall through. >> >>Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "allow fall-through" >>with a "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to >>find. Applied to 5.1/scsi-q

Re: [PATCH 36/41] scsi: qla4xxx: ql4_os: mark expected switch fall-through

2018-12-24 Thread Nilesh Javali
On 11/28/18, 10:03 AM, "linux-scsi-ow...@vger.kernel.org on behalf of Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote: >External Email > >In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases >where we are expecting to fall through. > >Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "allow fall-thro

Re: [PATCH 36/41] scsi: qla4xxx: ql4_os: mark expected switch fall-through

2018-12-19 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
Hi, Friendly ping: Who can ack or review this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:33 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "allow