On 04/21/2015 02:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Fenghua Yu wrote:
>> From: Fenghua Yu
>> When enumerating xstate offsets and sizes from cpuid (eax=0x0d, ecx>=2),
>> it's possible that state m is not implemented while state n (n>m)
>> is implemented. So enumeration shouldn't
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> > This is a regular hardware enablement or are you saying that this is
> > backport
> > material?
>
> I would like the patch to be backported to distros or stable kernel because
> we may really see the issue in near future if it's not backported.
Then
> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:t...@linutronix.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 2:17 AM
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Fenghua Yu wrote:
>
> > From: Fenghua Yu
> >
> > When enumerating xstate offsets and sizes from cpuid (eax=0x0d,
> > ecx>=2), it's possible that state m is not implemented while
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> From: Fenghua Yu
>
> When enumerating xstate offsets and sizes from cpuid (eax=0x0d, ecx>=2),
> it's possible that state m is not implemented while state n (n>m)
> is implemented. So enumeration shouldn't stop at state m.
>
> There is no platform
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Fenghua Yu wrote:
From: Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com
When enumerating xstate offsets and sizes from cpuid (eax=0x0d, ecx=2),
it's possible that state m is not implemented while state n (nm)
is implemented. So enumeration shouldn't stop at state m.
There is no
From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:t...@linutronix.de]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 2:17 AM
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Fenghua Yu wrote:
From: Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com
When enumerating xstate offsets and sizes from cpuid (eax=0x0d,
ecx=2), it's possible that state m is not implemented
On 04/21/2015 02:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Fenghua Yu wrote:
From: Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com
When enumerating xstate offsets and sizes from cpuid (eax=0x0d, ecx=2),
it's possible that state m is not implemented while state n (nm)
is implemented. So enumeration
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
This is a regular hardware enablement or are you saying that this is
backport
material?
I would like the patch to be backported to distros or stable kernel because
we may really see the issue in near future if it's not backported.
Then you should
From: Fenghua Yu
When enumerating xstate offsets and sizes from cpuid (eax=0x0d, ecx>=2),
it's possible that state m is not implemented while state n (n>m)
is implemented. So enumeration shouldn't stop at state m.
There is no platform configured like above yet. But this could be a problem
in
From: Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com
When enumerating xstate offsets and sizes from cpuid (eax=0x0d, ecx=2),
it's possible that state m is not implemented while state n (nm)
is implemented. So enumeration shouldn't stop at state m.
There is no platform configured like above yet. But this could
10 matches
Mail list logo
