Hello Martin,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:58:01AM +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
> > I hit "reply-to-all" and the mail only was sent to you because you wrote
> > to only me.
>
> Yes my reply was only to you. But your original message was sent only to me
> too.
> So when i clicked reply to all it was
Hello,
> I hit "reply-to-all" and the mail only was sent to you because you wrote
> to only me.
Yes my reply was only to you. But your original message was sent only to me too.
So when i clicked reply to all it was only you as you sent it only to me.
> Also threading is somehow strange because
Hello Martin,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:29:19AM +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:12:23PM +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
> >> > Note there is already a series that changes these values to u64. See
> >> > a9d887dc1c60ed67f2271d66560cdcf864c4a578 in linux-next.
> >>
> >> Amazing.
> Could you please send the messages also to everyone else ?
Next time of course.
Hello Uwe,
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:12:23PM +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
>> > Note there is already a series that changes these values to u64. See
>> > a9d887dc1c60ed67f2271d66560cdcf864c4a578 in linux-next.
>>
>> Amazing. But isn't there the same issue with it as this one where this
>> would
> And all divisions go mad on 32-bit CPU, right?
> Please, if you thought about it carefully, update a commit message to
> clarify that.
Hello,
This patch will be dropped in V2 since another series already made these u64.
See a9d887dc1c60ed67f2271d66560cdcf864c4a578 in linux-next.
I have not
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:40 AM Martin Botka wrote:
>
> From: Fenglin Wu
>
> Currently, PWM core driver provides interfaces for configuring PWM
> period and duty length in nanoseconds with an integer data type, so
> the max period can be only set to ~2.147 seconds. Add interfaces which
> can
> +#include
> - gain_q23 = (gain_q23 * dmic->boost_gain) / 100;
> + gain_q23 = div_u64(gain_q23 * dmic->boost_gain, 100);
Ok so using a macro.
Thank you.
Hi!
> As can be seen this divides llu by llu in few warnings and error.
> At the time of sending i didn't realize it but this fails on 32 bit
> architectures.
>
> So i would like to ask how would you like this fixed ?
> Using macro or some other way ?
+#include
- gain_q23 =
Hello,
As can be seen this divides llu by llu in few warnings and error.
At the time of sending i didn't realize it but this fails on 32 bit
architectures.
So i would like to ask how would you like this fixed ?
Using macro or some other way ?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Martin
From: Fenglin Wu
Currently, PWM core driver provides interfaces for configuring PWM
period and duty length in nanoseconds with an integer data type, so
the max period can be only set to ~2.147 seconds. Add interfaces which
can set PWM period and duty with u64 data type to remove this
limitation.
11 matches
Mail list logo
