On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 09:01 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > I was pointed by Glauber to the slab common code patches. I need some
> > more time to read the patches. Now I think the slab/slot changes in this
> > v3 are not needed, and can be ignored.
>
> That may take some kernel cycles. You
> I was pointed by Glauber to the slab common code patches. I need some
> more time to read the patches. Now I think the slab/slot changes in this
> v3 are not needed, and can be ignored.
That may take some kernel cycles. You have a current issue here that needs
to be fixed.
> >
I was pointed by Glauber to the slab common code patches. I need some
more time to read the patches. Now I think the slab/slot changes in this
v3 are not needed, and can be ignored.
That may take some kernel cycles. You have a current issue here that needs
to be fixed.
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 09:01 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
I was pointed by Glauber to the slab common code patches. I need some
more time to read the patches. Now I think the slab/slot changes in this
v3 are not needed, and can be ignored.
That may take some kernel cycles. You have a
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 08:56 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I thought I posted this a couple of days ago. Would this not fix things
> without having to change all the allocators?
I was pointed by Glauber to the slab common code patches. I need some
more time to read the patches. Now I think the
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 08:56 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
I thought I posted this a couple of days ago. Would this not fix things
without having to change all the allocators?
I was pointed by Glauber to the slab common code patches. I need some
more time to read the patches. Now I think the
6 matches
Mail list logo
