thew Garrett
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; Dmitry Torokhov; l...@kernel.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; f...@adinet.com.uy;
> l...@dorileo.org; Zheng, Lv; Moore, Robert
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ACPI/Battery: Add a _BIX quirk for NEC LZ750/LS
>
> O
On 01/15/2014 10:47 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:42:31PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index fbf1ace..e98fa83 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static int
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:42:31PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> index fbf1ace..e98fa83 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>
On 01/15/2014 06:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 09:24:06 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:37:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael
On 01/15/2014 06:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 09:24:06 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:37:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:42:31PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index fbf1ace..e98fa83 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device)
On 01/15/2014 10:47 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:42:31PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index fbf1ace..e98fa83 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static int
: Rafael J. Wysocki; Dmitry Torokhov; l...@kernel.org; linux-
a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; f...@adinet.com.uy;
l...@dorileo.org; Zheng, Lv; Moore, Robert
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ACPI/Battery: Add a _BIX quirk for NEC LZ750/LS
On 01/15/2014 10:47 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote
On 01/14/2014 03:37 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).
Ah, sorry, I missed this chunk of the thread. If the
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 09:24:06 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:37:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > Queued up
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:37:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).
> >
> > Ah, sorry, I
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).
>
> Ah, sorry, I missed this chunk of the thread. If the system provides
> valid _BIF data then we
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).
Ah, sorry, I missed this chunk of the thread. If the system provides
valid _BIF data then we should possibly just fall back to that rather
than adding another quirk
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).
Ah, sorry, I missed this chunk of the thread. If the system provides
valid _BIF data then we should possibly just fall back to that rather
than adding another quirk
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).
Ah, sorry, I missed this chunk of the thread. If the system provides
valid _BIF data then we should
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:37:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).
Ah, sorry, I missed this
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 09:24:06 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:37:02PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Queued up as a fix for
On 01/14/2014 03:37 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).
Ah, sorry, I missed this chunk of the thread. If the
On Monday, January 06, 2014 09:59:12 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Lan,
>
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:50:37PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> > The aml method _BIX of NEC LZ750/LS returns a broken package which
> > skip the first member "Revision" according ACPI 5.0 spec Table 10-234.
> >
> > This
Hi Lan,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:50:37PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> The aml method _BIX of NEC LZ750/LS returns a broken package which
> skip the first member "Revision" according ACPI 5.0 spec Table 10-234.
>
> This patch is to add a quirk for this machine to skip member "Revision"
> during
The aml method _BIX of NEC LZ750/LS returns a broken package which
skip the first member "Revision" according ACPI 5.0 spec Table 10-234.
This patch is to add a quirk for this machine to skip member "Revision"
during parsing _BIX returned package.
Reported-and-tested-by: Francisco Castro
The aml method _BIX of NEC LZ750/LS returns a broken package which
skip the first member Revision according ACPI 5.0 spec Table 10-234.
This patch is to add a quirk for this machine to skip member Revision
during parsing _BIX returned package.
Reported-and-tested-by: Francisco Castro
Hi Lan,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:50:37PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
The aml method _BIX of NEC LZ750/LS returns a broken package which
skip the first member Revision according ACPI 5.0 spec Table 10-234.
This patch is to add a quirk for this machine to skip member Revision
during parsing
On Monday, January 06, 2014 09:59:12 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Lan,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:50:37PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
The aml method _BIX of NEC LZ750/LS returns a broken package which
skip the first member Revision according ACPI 5.0 spec Table 10-234.
This patch is to
24 matches
Mail list logo
