Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] cpufreq: handle calls to ->target_index() in separate routine

2014-05-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 27 May 2014 04:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I guess I can take this one without the rest of the series? Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordo

Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] cpufreq: handle calls to ->target_index() in separate routine

2014-05-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 02:29:29 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Handling calls to ->target_index() has got complex over time and might become > more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another > routine > __target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any function

[PATCH V4 1/3] cpufreq: handle calls to ->target_index() in separate routine

2014-05-21 Thread Viresh Kumar
Handling calls to ->target_index() has got complex over time and might become more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another routine __target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any functional impact. Tested-by: Stephen Warren Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson S