On 5/28/25 11:08, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:58:28AM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> Administrative query: while net-next is closed, am I supposed to mark this
>> series as "RFC" and post v2 for a review as usual, or is it better to just
>> hold off until net-next opens?
On 5/27/25 10:41, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 10:44:05PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> On 5/26/25 16:39, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 02:51:18PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
On 5/26/25 10:25, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2025
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:58:28AM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
On 5/27/25 10:41, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 10:44:05PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
On 5/26/25 16:39, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 02:51:18PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
On 5/26/25 10:25
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 10:44:05PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
On 5/26/25 16:39, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 02:51:18PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
On 5/26/25 10:25, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
Increase the cov
On 5/26/25 16:39, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 02:51:18PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> On 5/26/25 10:25, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
Increase the coverage of test for UAF due to socket unbinding, and losi
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 02:51:18PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
On 5/26/25 10:25, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
Increase the coverage of test for UAF due to socket unbinding, and losing
transport in general. It's a follow up to commit 30
On 5/26/25 10:25, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> Increase the coverage of test for UAF due to socket unbinding, and losing
>> transport in general. It's a follow up to commit 301a62dfb0d0 ("vsock/test:
>> Add test for UAF due to socket
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
Increase the coverage of test for UAF due to socket unbinding, and losing
transport in general. It's a follow up to commit 301a62dfb0d0 ("vsock/test:
Add test for UAF due to socket unbinding") and discussion in [1].
The idea remains
Increase the coverage of test for UAF due to socket unbinding, and losing
transport in general. It's a follow up to commit 301a62dfb0d0 ("vsock/test:
Add test for UAF due to socket unbinding") and discussion in [1].
The idea remains the same: take an unconnected stream socket with a
transport assi
9 matches
Mail list logo
