On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:37:40 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > +static struct dsa_port *dsa_port_touch(struct dsa_switch *ds, int index)
> > +{
> > + struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
> > + struct dsa_port *dp;
> > +
> > + dp = >ports[index];
> > +
> > + dp->ds = ds;
> > + dp->index =
> +static struct dsa_port *dsa_port_touch(struct dsa_switch *ds, int index)
> +{
> + struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
> + struct dsa_port *dp;
> +
> + dp = >ports[index];
> +
> + dp->ds = ds;
> + dp->index = index;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(>list);
> +
On 10/19/2019 8:19 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Add a list of switch ports within the switch fabric. This will help the
> lookup of a port inside the whole fabric, and it is the first step
> towards supporting multiple CPU ports, before deprecating the usage of
> the unique dst->cpu_dp pointer.
On 10/19/2019 8:19 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Add a list of switch ports within the switch fabric. This will help the
> lookup of a port inside the whole fabric, and it is the first step
> towards supporting multiple CPU ports, before deprecating the usage of
> the unique dst->cpu_dp pointer.
Add a list of switch ports within the switch fabric. This will help the
lookup of a port inside the whole fabric, and it is the first step
towards supporting multiple CPU ports, before deprecating the usage of
the unique dst->cpu_dp pointer.
In preparation for a future allocation of the dsa_port
5 matches
Mail list logo
