Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] phy: qcom-qmp: Fix clock-cells binding and provider

Hi, On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:15 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > Vivek, > > On 04/12/18 6:07 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > > Hi Kishon, > > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 1:44 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >> > >> Hi Andy Gross, David Brown, Vivek, > >> > >> On 30/11/18 3:43 AM, Evan Green wro

Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] phy: qcom-qmp: Fix clock-cells binding and provider

Vivek, On 04/12/18 6:07 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 1:44 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> >> Hi Andy Gross, David Brown, Vivek, >> >> On 30/11/18 3:43 AM, Evan Green wrote: >>> This series fixes the QMP PHY bindings, which had specified #clock-cells >>> in

Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] phy: qcom-qmp: Fix clock-cells binding and provider

Hi Kishon, On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 1:44 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > Hi Andy Gross, David Brown, Vivek, > > On 30/11/18 3:43 AM, Evan Green wrote: > > This series fixes the QMP PHY bindings, which had specified #clock-cells > > in the parent node, and had set it to 1. Putting it in the par

Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] phy: qcom-qmp: Fix clock-cells binding and provider

Hi Andy Gross, David Brown, Vivek, On 30/11/18 3:43 AM, Evan Green wrote: > This series fixes the QMP PHY bindings, which had specified #clock-cells > in the parent node, and had set it to 1. Putting it in the parent node is > wrong because the clock providers are the child nodes, so this change >

[PATCH v1 0/4] phy: qcom-qmp: Fix clock-cells binding and provider

This series fixes the QMP PHY bindings, which had specified #clock-cells in the parent node, and had set it to 1. Putting it in the parent node is wrong because the clock providers are the child nodes, so this change moves it there. Having it set to 1 is also wrong, since nothing is ever specified