On Wed, 2018-11-21 at 00:07 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Weiyi Lu (2018-11-19 18:37:34)
> > On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 11:31 -0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:42 PM Weiyi Lu wrote:
>
> > > > @@ -226,6 +397,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain
>
Quoting Weiyi Lu (2018-11-19 18:37:34)
> On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 11:31 -0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:42 PM Weiyi Lu wrote:
> > > @@ -226,6 +397,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain
> > > *genpd)
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > goto
On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 11:31 -0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> (not a complete review...)
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:42 PM Weiyi Lu wrote:
> >
> > From: Owen Chen
> >
> > Both MT8183 & MT6765 add more bus protect node than previous project,
> > therefore we add two more register for setup bus pr
(not a complete review...)
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:42 PM Weiyi Lu wrote:
>
> From: Owen Chen
>
> Both MT8183 & MT6765 add more bus protect node than previous project,
> therefore we add two more register for setup bus protect, which reside
> at INFRA_CFG & SMI_COMMON.
>
> With the following ch
From: Owen Chen
Both MT8183 & MT6765 add more bus protect node than previous project,
therefore we add two more register for setup bus protect, which reside
at INFRA_CFG & SMI_COMMON.
With the following change
1. bus protect need not only infracfg but smi_common registers involved
to setup. T
5 matches
Mail list logo