On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 01:29:30PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> So was this duplication dead code in essence?
>
> See e2b32e678513.
>
> Looks like it was parsing the cmdline option for a second time in the
> kernel proper (vs first one which
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 01:29:30PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So was this duplication dead code in essence?
See e2b32e678513.
Looks like it was parsing the cmdline option for a second time in the
kernel proper (vs first one which we still parse in the compressed
kernel).
hpa said that we probab
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 01:07:13PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > So doesn't a 'nokaslr' boot option still make sense, to be able to
> > debug KASLR failures and such?
>
> That's still parsed in arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
So was this duplication dead code in ess
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 01:07:13PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So doesn't a 'nokaslr' boot option still make sense, to be able to
> debug KASLR failures and such?
That's still parsed in arch/x86/boot/compressed/aslr.c
> > + if (kaslr_enabled())
> > + pr_emerg("Kernel Offset: 0x%lx fr
* Borislav Petkov wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/module.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>
> #include
> #include
> +#include
>
> #if 0
> #define DEBUGP(fmt, ...) \
> @@ -47,21 +48,13 @@ do {
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:49:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v1.1] x86/mm/ASLR: Propagate ASLR status to kernel proper
Commit
e2b32e678513 ("x86, kaslr: randomize module base load address")
made module base address randomization unconditional and didn't regard
6 matches
Mail list logo
