On 2019/4/8 9:52, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 5:38 PM Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>
>> On 2019/4/8 1:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:32 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote:
> The architecture specific information of
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 5:38 PM Li, Aubrey wrote:
>
> On 2019/4/8 1:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:32 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote:
> >>
> >>> The architecture specific information of the running processes could
> >>> be useful
On 2019/4/7 23:46, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 09:02:38PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> On 2019/4/7 5:41, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:32:35PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +/* Add support for architecture specific output in /proc/pid/status */
On 2019/4/8 1:34, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:32 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote:
>>
>>> The architecture specific information of the running processes could
>>> be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
>>> s
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:32 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote:
>
> > The architecture specific information of the running processes could
> > be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
> > specific information externally.
> >
> > Signed
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 09:02:38PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2019/4/7 5:41, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:32:35PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>> +/* Add support for architecture specific output in /proc/pid/status */
> >>> +extern void arch_proc_pid_status(struct se
On 2019/4/7 5:41, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:32:35PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> +/* Add support for architecture specific output in /proc/pid/status */
>>> +extern void arch_proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct
>>> *task);
> ^^
>
> Unnece
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:32:35PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > +/* Add support for architecture specific output in /proc/pid/status */
> > +extern void arch_proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct
> > *task);
^^
Unnecessary extern.
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote:
> The architecture specific information of the running processes could
> be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
> specific information externally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra
> Cc: Andi Kleen
> Cc: Tim
The architecture specific information of the running processes could
be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
specific information externally.
Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Tim Chen
Cc: Dave Hansen
Cc: Arjan van de Ven
---
fs/pr
10 matches
Mail list logo
