Thanks Eric!
On 2016-05-10 01:06 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Robert Foss writes:
On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
robert.f...@collabora.com writes:
From: Robert Foss
As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
-EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and
Robert Foss writes:
> On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> robert.f...@collabora.com writes:
>>
>>> From: Robert Foss
>>>
>>> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
>>> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
>>> update pending.
On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
robert.f...@collabora.com writes:
From: Robert Foss
As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
-EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
update pending.
Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and
robert.f...@collabora.com writes:
> From: Robert Foss
>
> As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
> -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
> update pending.
>
> Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
>
> * - -E
From: Robert Foss
As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
-EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
update pending.
Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
* - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and
5 matches
Mail list logo