[PATCH v2] mmc: extend ricoh_mmc to support Ricoh RL5c476

2008-02-04 Thread Frank Seidel
From: Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch (base on current linus git tree plus Philip Langdales suspend/resume patch) adds support for the Ricoh RL5c476 chip: with this the mmc adapter that needs this disabler (R5C843) can also be handled correctly when it sits on a RL5c476. (+ minor style

Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: extend ricoh_mmc to support Ricoh RL5c476

2008-02-04 Thread Philip Langdale
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:25:42 +0100, Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This patch (base on current linus git tree plus Philip Langdales > suspend/resume patch) adds support for the Ricoh RL5c476 chip: > with this the mmc adapter that needs this dis

Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: extend ricoh_mmc to support Ricoh RL5c476

2008-02-07 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:25:42 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This patch (base on current linus git tree plus Philip Langdales > suspend/resume patch) adds support for the Ricoh RL5c476 chip: > with this the mmc adapter that needs this disa

Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: extend ricoh_mmc to support Ricoh RL5c476

2008-02-07 Thread Frank Seidel
Hi, On Thursday 07 February 2008 09:08, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:25:42 +0100 > Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I see you've guys have kept yourself busy in my absence. :) Yes, we really did :) > As for the patch

Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: extend ricoh_mmc to support Ricoh RL5c476

2008-02-07 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:20:38 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Wouldn't it be prudent to have a check that this is indeed a R5C832, > > and a failure mode if it's none of the two known devices? > > Also thought about that, but as far as i can see this cannot happen since > we