On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:07:43PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> I'm not seeing any verification of the metadata in fec_read_parity() --
> so it would seem that corrupt RS blocks would result in -EBADMSG being
> returned from decode_rs8() (by virtue of incorrect parity being passed
> to decode_rs8).
On Mon, Dec 07 2015 at 1:07pm -0500,
Milan Broz wrote:
> On 12/07/2015 05:31 PM, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:58:14AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >> Great. Moving forward it'd be awesome if you could work to get your
> >> verity FEC support regression tests into cryptset
On 12/07/2015 05:31 PM, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:58:14AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> Great. Moving forward it'd be awesome if you could work to get your
>> verity FEC support regression tests into cryptsetup's tests.
>
> Sure. These tests would basically involve generat
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:58:14AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Great. Moving forward it'd be awesome if you could work to get your
> verity FEC support regression tests into cryptsetup's tests.
Sure. These tests would basically involve generating a valid disk
image, corrupting it up to the theor
On Mon, Dec 07 2015 at 8:21am -0500,
Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:09:35PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > I'd really appreciate it if you could do some regression testing,
> > etc on your end to verify I didn't break anything while tweaking
> > things.
>
> Sure. The changes
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:09:35PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> I'd really appreciate it if you could do some regression testing,
> etc on your end to verify I didn't break anything while tweaking
> things.
Sure. The changes look fine. I applied them to my tree and everything
still works as expect
On Fri, Dec 04 2015 at 5:03P -0500,
Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:05:38PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > If you're OK with those changes I'll fold that commit into your main FEC
> > commit.
>
> Yes, these changes look fine. Thanks!
OK, I reviewed the FEC code and have stage
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:05:38PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> If you're OK with those changes I'll fold that commit into your main FEC
> commit.
Yes, these changes look fine. Thanks!
Sami
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo
On Thu, Dec 03 2015 at 2:54pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03 2015 at 9:26am -0500,
> Sami Tolvanen wrote:
>
> > Changes since v1:
> >
> > - Added CONFIG_DM_VERITY_FEC and split error correction into
> > dm-verity-fec.[ch] to further separate the functionality from the
> >
On Thu, Dec 03 2015 at 9:26am -0500,
Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Changes since v1:
>
> - Added CONFIG_DM_VERITY_FEC and split error correction into
> dm-verity-fec.[ch] to further separate the functionality from the
> rest of dm-verity. Follows the same pattern as dm-uevent.
>
> - Added
Changes since v1:
- Added CONFIG_DM_VERITY_FEC and split error correction into
dm-verity-fec.[ch] to further separate the functionality from the
rest of dm-verity. Follows the same pattern as dm-uevent.
- Added missing dependencies for REED_SOLOMON to Kconfig.
- Renamed dm-verity.c
11 matches
Mail list logo
