Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clock scaling

2021-01-05 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Stanley, > However this series may not be required to be merged to 5.10. The > choice of base branch is simply making these patches easy to be > reviewed because this series is based on clk-scaling fixes by Can. Please redo your series on top of 5.12/scsi-queue + Can's changes. Thanks! --

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clock scaling

2020-12-17 Thread Can Guo
On 2020-12-18 14:24, Stanley Chu wrote: Hi Can, On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 14:20 +0800, Can Guo wrote: On 2020-12-16 21:16, Stanley Chu wrote: > Hi, > This series cleans up and refactors clk-scaling feature, and shall not > change any functionality. > > This series is based on Can's series "Three

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clock scaling

2020-12-17 Thread Stanley Chu
Hi Can, On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 14:20 +0800, Can Guo wrote: > On 2020-12-16 21:16, Stanley Chu wrote: > > Hi, > > This series cleans up and refactors clk-scaling feature, and shall not > > change any functionality. > > > > This series is based on Can's series "Three changes related with UFS > >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clock scaling

2020-12-17 Thread Can Guo
On 2020-12-16 21:16, Stanley Chu wrote: Hi, This series cleans up and refactors clk-scaling feature, and shall not change any functionality. This series is based on Can's series "Three changes related with UFS clock scaling" in 5.10/scsi-fixes branch in Martin's tree. Hi Stanley, Thanks for

[PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup and refactor clock scaling

2020-12-16 Thread Stanley Chu
Hi, This series cleans up and refactors clk-scaling feature, and shall not change any functionality. This series is based on Can's series "Three changes related with UFS clock scaling" in 5.10/scsi-fixes branch in Martin's tree. However this series may not be required to be merged to 5.10. The