On 6/26/24 9:39 AM, Dominic Rath wrote:
On 13.06.2024 14:22, Andrew Davis wrote:
We looked into this some time ago, and noticed that the IRQ approach caused
problems in the virtio/rpmsg code. I'd like to understand if your change was
for the same reason, or something else we missed before.
On 13.06.2024 14:22, Andrew Davis wrote:
We looked into this some time ago, and noticed that the IRQ approach
caused problems in the virtio/rpmsg code. I'd like to understand if
your change was for the same reason, or something else we missed before.
It is most likely the same reason. Seems
On 13.06.2024 14:22, Andrew Davis wrote:
We looked into this some time ago, and noticed that the IRQ approach
caused problems in the virtio/rpmsg code. I'd like to understand if
your change was for the same reason, or something else we missed before.
It is most likely the same reason. Seems
On 6/13/24 2:58 AM, Dominic Rath wrote:
Hello Andrew,
On 10.04.2024 15:59, Andrew Davis wrote:
Changes for v2:
- Use threaded irq as suggested by Hari and to
fix possible "scheduling while atomic" issue
sorry for beeing late, I noticed this already got merged.
I was wondering what
Hello Andrew,
On 10.04.2024 15:59, Andrew Davis wrote:
Changes for v2:
- Use threaded irq as suggested by Hari and to
fix possible "scheduling while atomic" issue
sorry for beeing late, I noticed this already got merged.
I was wondering what the reason was for ending up with the
Hello all,
Core of this series is the last patch removing the message FIFO
from OMAP mailbox. This hurts our real-time performance. It was a
legacy leftover from before the common mailbox framework anyway.
The rest of the patches are cleanups found along the way.
Thanks,
Andrew
Changes for v2:
6 matches
Mail list logo
