Hey,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:10:34PM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> you assign id1 to 0, so this never happens i think. i don't think the
> reason to preassign id1/id2 exists anymore once the do loop is removed.
>
> > + id1 = idr_alloc(>idr, handle1, 0, 0,
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:52:10 -0800
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Subject: atm/nicstar: convert to idr_alloc()
>
> Convert to the much saner new idr interface. The existing code looks
> buggy to me - ID 0 is treated as no-ID but allocation specifies 0 as
> lower limit and there's no error handling after
Subject: atm/nicstar: convert to idr_alloc()
Convert to the much saner new idr interface. The existing code looks
buggy to me - ID 0 is treated as no-ID but allocation specifies 0 as
lower limit and there's no error handling after partial success. This
conversion keeps the bugs unchanged.
Only
Subject: atm/nicstar: convert to idr_alloc()
Convert to the much saner new idr interface. The existing code looks
buggy to me - ID 0 is treated as no-ID but allocation specifies 0 as
lower limit and there's no error handling after partial success. This
conversion keeps the bugs unchanged.
Only
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:52:10 -0800
Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Subject: atm/nicstar: convert to idr_alloc()
Convert to the much saner new idr interface. The existing code looks
buggy to me - ID 0 is treated as no-ID but allocation specifies 0 as
lower limit and there's no error
Hey,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:10:34PM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
you assign id1 to 0, so this never happens i think. i don't think the
reason to preassign id1/id2 exists anymore once the do loop is removed.
+ id1 = idr_alloc(card-idr, handle1, 0, 0,
6 matches
Mail list logo