On 12 July 2018 at 10:06, Stefan Agner wrote:
> In the uSDHC case (e.g. i.MX 6) clocks only get disabled if frequency
> is set to 0. However, it could be that the stack asks for a frequency
> change while clocks are on. In that case the function clears the
> divider registers (by clearing ESDHC_CL
On 12/07/18 11:07, Stefan Agner wrote:
> In the uSDHC case (e.g. i.MX 6) clocks only get disabled if frequency
> is set to 0. However, it could be that the stack asks for a frequency
> change while clocks are on. In that case the function clears the
> divider registers (by clearing ESDHC_CLOCK_MASK
nel.org; Stefan Agner
>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: disable clocks before
> changing frequency
>
> In the uSDHC case (e.g. i.MX 6) clocks only get disabled if frequency is set
> to 0.
> However, it could be that the stack asks for a frequency change while clocks
On 12.07.2018 10:06, Stefan Agner wrote:
> In the uSDHC case (e.g. i.MX 6) clocks only get disabled if frequency
> is set to 0. However, it could be that the stack asks for a frequency
> change while clocks are on. In that case the function clears the
> divider registers (by clearing ESDHC_CLOCK_MA
In the uSDHC case (e.g. i.MX 6) clocks only get disabled if frequency
is set to 0. However, it could be that the stack asks for a frequency
change while clocks are on. In that case the function clears the
divider registers (by clearing ESDHC_CLOCK_MASK) while the clock is
enabled! This causes a sho
In the uSDHC case (e.g. i.MX 6) clocks only get disabled if frequency
is set to 0. However, it could be that the stack asks for a frequency
change while clocks are on. In that case the function clears the
divider registers (by clearing ESDHC_CLOCK_MASK) while the clock is
enabled! This causes a sho
6 matches
Mail list logo