On 5 June 2015 at 04:59, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/29/2015 03:06 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> We're currently using a fixed frequency clock specified in the DT, so
>> enabling is a no-op. However, the RPi firmware-based clocks driver
>> can actually disable unused clocks, so when switching to us
On 05/29/2015 03:06 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> We're currently using a fixed frequency clock specified in the DT, so
> enabling is a no-op. However, the RPi firmware-based clocks driver
> can actually disable unused clocks, so when switching to use it we
> ended up losing our MMC clock once all devi
On 29 May 2015 at 23:06, Eric Anholt wrote:
> We're currently using a fixed frequency clock specified in the DT, so
> enabling is a no-op. However, the RPi firmware-based clocks driver
> can actually disable unused clocks, so when switching to use it we
> ended up losing our MMC clock once all de
We're currently using a fixed frequency clock specified in the DT, so
enabling is a no-op. However, the RPi firmware-based clocks driver
can actually disable unused clocks, so when switching to use it we
ended up losing our MMC clock once all devices were probed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt
---
4 matches
Mail list logo
