On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 4:38 PM Tamir Duberstein wrote:
>
> Sure, that would be:
>
> Include all information in the panic message rather than emit fragments
> to stderr to avoid possible interleaving with other output.
>
> Let me know if I should send another spin for this, or if this is ok
> to d
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 9:21 AM Miguel Ojeda
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 3:15 PM Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> >
> > Include all information in the panic message rather than emit fragments
> > to stderr.
>
> Could we explain the "why" as well in the message? (i.e. not just the "what")
Sure, t
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 3:15 PM Tamir Duberstein wrote:
>
> Include all information in the panic message rather than emit fragments
> to stderr.
Could we explain the "why" as well in the message? (i.e. not just the "what")
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Include all information in the panic message rather than emit fragments
to stderr.
Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein
---
scripts/rustdoc_test_gen.rs | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/rustdoc_test_gen.rs b/scripts/rustdoc_test_gen.rs
index d796481f4
4 matches
Mail list logo