Am Montag, 7. Juli 2014, 08:21:40 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:08:41AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Montag, 7. Juli 2014, 09:42:52 schrieb addy ke:
> > > > Your DT binding defined some additional compatible strings, please add
> > > > those to the driver.
> >
> > citing M
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:08:41AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Montag, 7. Juli 2014, 09:42:52 schrieb addy ke:
> > > Your DT binding defined some additional compatible strings, please add
> > > those to the driver.
> citing Mark Rutland (one of the dt maintainers):
> --
> That's why I sai
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:42:52AM +0800, addy ke wrote:
> > The driver shouldn't be doing this, if it needs a delay it needs to
> > implement it itself. delay_usecs can be set by devices if they need a
> > delay between transfers, it should be in addition to the time taken for
> > the transfer t
Am Montag, 7. Juli 2014, 09:42:52 schrieb addy ke:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:03:59AM +0800, addy ke wrote:
> >> +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_spi_dt_match[] = {
> >> + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-spi", },
> >> + { },
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_spi_dt_ma
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:03:59AM +0800, addy ke wrote:
>> In order to facilitate understanding, rockchip SPI controller IP design
>> looks similar in its registers to designware. But IC implementation
>> is different from designware, So we need a dedicated driver for Rockchip
>> RK3XXX SoCs int
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:03:59AM +0800, addy ke wrote:
>> In order to facilitate understanding, rockchip SPI controller IP design
>> looks similar in its registers to designware. But IC implementation
>> is different from designware, So we need
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:03:59AM +0800, addy ke wrote:
> In order to facilitate understanding, rockchip SPI controller IP design
> looks similar in its registers to designware. But IC implementation
> is different from designware, So we need a dedicated driver for Rockchip
> RK3XXX SoCs integrate
In order to facilitate understanding, rockchip SPI controller IP design
looks similar in its registers to designware. But IC implementation
is different from designware, So we need a dedicated driver for Rockchip
RK3XXX SoCs integrated SPI. The main differences:
- dma request line: rockchip SPI co
8 matches
Mail list logo
