Frantisek Hrbata writes:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:05:57PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Frantisek Hrbata writes:
>> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:44:03AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> >> Kyle McMartin writes:
>> >> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
>> >>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:05:57PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Frantisek Hrbata writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:44:03AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> Kyle McMartin writes:
> >> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> >> >> > > v2: - reuse mod->ctors for
Frantisek Hrbata writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:44:03AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Kyle McMartin writes:
>> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
>> >> > > v2: - reuse mod->ctors for .init_array section for modules, because
>> >> > > gcc uses
>> >> > >
Frantisek Hrbata fhrb...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:44:03AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kyle McMartin k...@infradead.org writes:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
v2: - reuse mod-ctors for .init_array section for modules, because
gcc
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:05:57PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Frantisek Hrbata fhrb...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:44:03AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kyle McMartin k...@infradead.org writes:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
v2: -
Frantisek Hrbata fhrb...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:05:57PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Frantisek Hrbata fhrb...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:44:03AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kyle McMartin k...@infradead.org writes:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:28:14PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> I'm not sure if coexistence of .ctors and .init_array sections should result
> in
> denial of module, but I for sure know nothing about this :). Could you maybe
> privide one example of the "weird thing"?
>
They shouldn't exist
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:44:03AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Kyle McMartin writes:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> >> > > v2: - reuse mod->ctors for .init_array section for modules, because
> >> > > gcc uses
> >> > > .ctors or .init_array, but
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:44:03AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Kyle McMartin k...@infradead.org writes:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
v2: - reuse mod-ctors for .init_array section for modules, because
gcc uses
.ctors or .init_array, but not
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:28:14PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
I'm not sure if coexistence of .ctors and .init_array sections should result
in
denial of module, but I for sure know nothing about this :). Could you maybe
privide one example of the weird thing?
They shouldn't exist unless
Kyle McMartin writes:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
>> > > v2: - reuse mod->ctors for .init_array section for modules, because gcc
>> > > uses
>> > > .ctors or .init_array, but not both at the same time
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata
>>
Kyle McMartin k...@infradead.org writes:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
v2: - reuse mod-ctors for .init_array section for modules, because gcc
uses
.ctors or .init_array, but not both at the same time
Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> > > v2: - reuse mod->ctors for .init_array section for modules, because gcc
> > > uses
> > > .ctors or .init_array, but not both at the same time
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata
> >
> > Might be nice to
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:43:08AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Frantisek Hrbata writes:
> > This adds the .init_array section as yet another section with constructors.
> > This
> > is needed because gcc could add __gcov_init calls to .init_array or .ctors
> > section, depending on gcc version.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:43:08AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Frantisek Hrbata fhrb...@redhat.com writes:
This adds the .init_array section as yet another section with constructors.
This
is needed because gcc could add __gcov_init calls to .init_array or .ctors
section, depending on gcc
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:51:18PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
v2: - reuse mod-ctors for .init_array section for modules, because gcc
uses
.ctors or .init_array, but not both at the same time
Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata fhrb...@redhat.com
Might be nice to document
Frantisek Hrbata writes:
> This adds the .init_array section as yet another section with constructors.
> This
> is needed because gcc could add __gcov_init calls to .init_array or .ctors
> section, depending on gcc version.
>
> v2: - reuse mod->ctors for .init_array section for modules, because
Frantisek Hrbata fhrb...@redhat.com writes:
This adds the .init_array section as yet another section with constructors.
This
is needed because gcc could add __gcov_init calls to .init_array or .ctors
section, depending on gcc version.
v2: - reuse mod-ctors for .init_array section for
This adds the .init_array section as yet another section with constructors. This
is needed because gcc could add __gcov_init calls to .init_array or .ctors
section, depending on gcc version.
v2: - reuse mod->ctors for .init_array section for modules, because gcc uses
.ctors or .init_array,
This adds the .init_array section as yet another section with constructors. This
is needed because gcc could add __gcov_init calls to .init_array or .ctors
section, depending on gcc version.
v2: - reuse mod-ctors for .init_array section for modules, because gcc uses
.ctors or .init_array,
20 matches
Mail list logo
