On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > Now just agree with me that mbox_request_chan() should fail on request
> > of a known bad configuration request and I can code all this up and
> > re-submit. :D
> >
> You make me look like a jerk
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> Now just agree with me that mbox_request_chan() should fail on request
> of a known bad configuration request and I can code all this up and
> re-submit. :D
>
You make me look like a jerk :( My problem is not with validation as
such. I see
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >> > +
> >> >> >> > +static void
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > +
>> >> >> > +static void mbox_test_prepare_message(struct mbox_client *client,
>> >> >> >
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +static void mbox_test_prepare_message(struct mbox_client *client,
> >> >> > void *message)
> >> >> > +{
> >> >> > + struct
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static void mbox_test_prepare_message(struct mbox_client *client, void
>> >> > *message)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + struct mbox_test_device *tdev = dev_get_drvdata(client->dev);
>> >> >
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
> >> > to pass messages
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
>> > to pass messages between Mailbox users; however, it can be easily
>> >
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
to pass messages between Mailbox users;
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
+
+static void
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
+
+static void mbox_test_prepare_message(struct mbox_client *client,
void *message)
+{
+ struct mbox_test_device
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
+
+static void mbox_test_prepare_message(struct mbox_client *client, void
*message)
+{
+ struct mbox_test_device *tdev = dev_get_drvdata(client-dev);
+
+
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
+
+static void mbox_test_prepare_message(struct mbox_client
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Now just agree with me that mbox_request_chan() should fail on request
of a known bad configuration request and I can code all this up and
re-submit. :D
You make me look like
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Now just agree with me that mbox_request_chan() should fail on request
of a known bad configuration request and I can code all this up and
re-submit. :D
You make me look like a jerk :( My problem is not with validation
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
> > to pass messages between Mailbox users; however, it can be easily
> > hacked to support any type of Controller.
> >
> >
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
to pass messages between Mailbox users; however, it can be easily
hacked to support any type of Controller.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
> to pass messages between Mailbox users; however, it can be easily
> hacked to support any type of Controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
to pass messages between Mailbox users; however, it can be easily
hacked to support any type of Controller.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
to pass messages between Mailbox users; however, it can be easily
hacked to support any type of Controller.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig| 7 ++
drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 +
This particular Client implementation uses shared memory in order
to pass messages between Mailbox users; however, it can be easily
hacked to support any type of Controller.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
---
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig| 7 ++
drivers/mailbox/Makefile
30 matches
Mail list logo