Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes

2018-07-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 07/17/2018 08:54 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:44:07AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 07/02/2018 06:52 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:09:27PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> >>> If these per-cpu data is something like per-cpu refcounters,

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes

2018-07-17 Thread Roman Gushchin
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:44:07AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 07/02/2018 06:52 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:09:27PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> On 06/29/2018 11:12 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > The vmstat counter NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES w

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes

2018-07-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 07/02/2018 06:52 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:09:27PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 06/29/2018 11:12 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: The vmstat counter NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES was introduced by commit eb59254608bc ("mm: introduce NR_INDIRECTLY_REC

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes

2018-07-02 Thread Roman Gushchin
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:09:27PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 06/29/2018 11:12 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > >> > >> The vmstat counter NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES was introduced by commit > >> eb59254608bc ("mm: introduce NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES") with the > >> goal of > >> acco

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes

2018-06-30 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 06/29/2018 11:12 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: >> >> The vmstat counter NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES was introduced by commit >> eb59254608bc ("mm: introduce NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES") with the goal >> of >> accounting objects that can be reclaimed, but cannot be allocated via a >> SLAB_R

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes

2018-06-29 Thread Roman Gushchin
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 05:37:02PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 06/20/2018 01:23 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Vlastimil, > > > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > > > [auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master] > > [also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc1 next-20180619] >

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes

2018-06-29 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 06/20/2018 01:23 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Vlastimil, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master] > [also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc1 next-20180619] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to > h

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes

2018-06-20 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Vlastimil, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on mmotm/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc1 next-20180619] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linu

[PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes

2018-06-18 Thread Vlastimil Babka
The vmstat counter NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES was introduced by commit eb59254608bc ("mm: introduce NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES") with the goal of accounting objects that can be reclaimed, but cannot be allocated via a SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT cache. This is now possible via kmalloc() with __G