Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering

2018-06-12 Thread J, KEERTHY
On 6/13/2018 6:36 AM, J, KEERTHY wrote: On 6/13/2018 1:36 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: On 06/12/2018 02:59 AM, Keerthy wrote: Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous, instead call

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering

2018-06-12 Thread J, KEERTHY
On 6/13/2018 6:36 AM, J, KEERTHY wrote: On 6/13/2018 1:36 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: On 06/12/2018 02:59 AM, Keerthy wrote: Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous, instead call

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering

2018-06-12 Thread J, KEERTHY
On 6/13/2018 1:36 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: On 06/12/2018 02:59 AM, Keerthy wrote: Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous, instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering

2018-06-12 Thread J, KEERTHY
On 6/13/2018 1:36 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: On 06/12/2018 02:59 AM, Keerthy wrote: Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous, instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering

2018-06-12 Thread Grygorii Strashko
On 06/12/2018 02:59 AM, Keerthy wrote: > Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous > and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous, > instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them > in an array for later use. > >

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering

2018-06-12 Thread Grygorii Strashko
On 06/12/2018 02:59 AM, Keerthy wrote: > Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous > and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous, > instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them > in an array for later use. > >

[PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering

2018-06-12 Thread Keerthy
Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous, instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them in an array for later use. Signed-off-by: Keerthy --- Tested for GPIO Interrupts on

[PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering

2018-06-12 Thread Keerthy
Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous, instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them in an array for later use. Signed-off-by: Keerthy --- Tested for GPIO Interrupts on