RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's

2016-06-28 Thread Tan, Jui Nee
ernel.org; pty...@xes-inc.com; > lee.jo...@linaro.org; linux-g...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; Linus Walleij ; Yong, > Jonathan ; Yu, Ong Hock > ; Voon, Weifeng ; Wan > Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Prima

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's

2016-06-21 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:03:20AM +, Tan, Jui Nee wrote: > > Maybe, or make it modular and use MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, ...) to > > match the corresponding CPUs. > > We need CONFIG_X86_INTEL_NON_ACPI Kconfig option to select CONFIG_PINCTRL. > This is to solve kbuidbot complaint about kernel

RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's

2016-06-20 Thread Tan, Jui Nee
.org; > pty...@xes-inc.com; lee.jo...@linaro.org; linux-g...@vger.kernel.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yong, Jonathan ; > Yu, Ong Hock ; Voon, Weifeng > ; Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband > bridge sup

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's

2016-06-13 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 06:19:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 17:25 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:54:31PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Would work to me, though still the same question: is it possible to > > > avoid building it on even

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's

2016-06-13 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 17:25 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:54:31PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Would work to me, though still the same question: is it possible to > > avoid building it on even most of Intel platforms, since there, I > > assume, will be not many use

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's

2016-06-13 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:54:31PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Would work to me, though still the same question: is it possible to > avoid building it on even most of Intel platforms, since there, I > assume, will be not many users of the module? Well, even if you make it configurable via Kcon

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's

2016-06-13 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 17:05 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:55:52PM +0800, Tan Jui Nee wrote: > > From: Andy Shevchenko > > > > There is already one and at least one more user coming which > > require an access to Primary to Sideband bridge (P2SB) in order > > to get IO

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's

2016-06-09 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:55:52PM +0800, Tan Jui Nee wrote: > From: Andy Shevchenko > > There is already one and at least one more user coming which > require an access to Primary to Sideband bridge (P2SB) in order > to get IO or MMIO bar hidden by BIOS. > Create a driver to access P2SB for x86

[PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband bridge support driver for Intel SOC's

2016-06-06 Thread Tan Jui Nee
From: Andy Shevchenko There is already one and at least one more user coming which require an access to Primary to Sideband bridge (P2SB) in order to get IO or MMIO bar hidden by BIOS. Create a driver to access P2SB for x86 devices. Signed-off-by: Yong, Jonathan Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko