Re: [PATCH v3 20/37] ARM: davinci: aintc: move timer-specific irq_set_handler() out of irq.c

2019-02-14 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
czw., 14 lut 2019 o 13:44 Sekhar Nori napisał(a): > > On 14/02/19 4:27 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:38:18 +, > > Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > >> > >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski > >> > >> I've been unable to figure out exactly why, but it seems that the > >> IRQ_TINT1_TIN

Re: [PATCH v3 20/37] ARM: davinci: aintc: move timer-specific irq_set_handler() out of irq.c

2019-02-14 Thread Sekhar Nori
On 14/02/19 4:27 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:38:18 +, > Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >> >> I've been unable to figure out exactly why, but it seems that the >> IRQ_TINT1_TINT34 interrupt for timer 1 needs to be handled as a >> level irq, not

Re: [PATCH v3 20/37] ARM: davinci: aintc: move timer-specific irq_set_handler() out of irq.c

2019-02-14 Thread Marc Zyngier
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:38:18 +, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > I've been unable to figure out exactly why, but it seems that the > IRQ_TINT1_TINT34 interrupt for timer 1 needs to be handled as a > level irq, not edge like all others. > > Let's move the handler

[PATCH v3 20/37] ARM: davinci: aintc: move timer-specific irq_set_handler() out of irq.c

2019-02-12 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski I've been unable to figure out exactly why, but it seems that the IRQ_TINT1_TINT34 interrupt for timer 1 needs to be handled as a level irq, not edge like all others. Let's move the handler setup out of the aintc driver where it's lived since the beginning and into the