On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:08:32AM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:13:43AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:22:40PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:13:43AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:22:40PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
> > >
> > > If the common
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:13:43AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:22:40PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
If the common usb_otg and
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:08:32AM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:13:43AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:22:40PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:22:40PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
> >
> > If the common usb_otg and usb_phy struct still has another's pointer, you
> > may not
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:22:40PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
If the common usb_otg and usb_phy struct still has another's pointer, you
may not need to add
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:22:40PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
>
> If the common usb_otg and usb_phy struct still has another's pointer, you
> may not need to add this patch.
Except if we want to access the OTG member when not
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:22:40PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
If the common usb_otg and usb_phy struct still has another's pointer, you
may not need to add this patch.
Except if we want to access the OTG member when not using
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
> Move the usb_otg member from struct usb_phy to struct ci_hdrc. Rework
> its initialization taking in account this modification.
>
If the common usb_otg and usb_phy struct still has another's pointer, you
may not need to add this
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote:
Move the usb_otg member from struct usb_phy to struct ci_hdrc. Rework
its initialization taking in account this modification.
If the common usb_otg and usb_phy struct still has another's pointer, you
may not need to add this
Move the usb_otg member from struct usb_phy to struct ci_hdrc. Rework
its initialization taking in account this modification.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart
---
drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h | 1 +
drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c| 8 +++-
drivers/usb/chipidea/otg_fsm.c | 15
Move the usb_otg member from struct usb_phy to struct ci_hdrc. Rework
its initialization taking in account this modification.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart antoine.ten...@free-electrons.com
---
drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h | 1 +
drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c| 8 +++-
12 matches
Mail list logo