Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] arm64/numa: remove some useless code

On 2016/6/7 16:28, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Zhen Lei wrote: >> 1. Currently only cpu0 set on cpu_possible_mask and percpu areas have not >>been initialized. >> 2. No reason to limit cpu0 must belongs to node0. > > even smp

Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] arm64/numa: remove some useless code

On 2016/6/7 16:28, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Zhen Lei wrote: >> 1. Currently only cpu0 set on cpu_possible_mask and percpu areas have not >>been initialized. >> 2. No reason to limit cpu0 must belongs to node0. > > even smp init assumes cpu0/boot

Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] arm64/numa: remove some useless code

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Zhen Lei wrote: > 1. Currently only cpu0 set on cpu_possible_mask and percpu areas have not >been initialized. > 2. No reason to limit cpu0 must belongs to node0. even smp init assumes cpu0/boot processor. is this patch tested on

Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] arm64/numa: remove some useless code

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Zhen Lei wrote: > 1. Currently only cpu0 set on cpu_possible_mask and percpu areas have not >been initialized. > 2. No reason to limit cpu0 must belongs to node0. even smp init assumes cpu0/boot processor. is this patch tested on any hardware? can you describe

[PATCH v4 12/14] arm64/numa: remove some useless code

1. Currently only cpu0 set on cpu_possible_mask and percpu areas have not been initialized. 2. No reason to limit cpu0 must belongs to node0. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei --- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH v4 12/14] arm64/numa: remove some useless code

1. Currently only cpu0 set on cpu_possible_mask and percpu areas have not been initialized. 2. No reason to limit cpu0 must belongs to node0. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei --- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c