Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] i2c: i2c-cbus-gpio: Add vendor prefix to retu node in example

2017-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The example contains a device node for a retu device, but > its compatible string doesn't have a vendor prefix. > > While being there, drop the -mfd suffix since isn't correct. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas

Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] i2c: i2c-cbus-gpio: Add vendor prefix to retu node in example

2017-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The example contains a device node for a retu device, but > its compatible string doesn't have a vendor prefix. > > While being there, drop the -mfd suffix since isn't correct. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas

Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] i2c: i2c-cbus-gpio: Add vendor prefix to retu node in example

2017-04-19 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Wolfram, On 04/19/2017 02:51 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> The example contains a device node for a retu device, but >> its compatible string doesn't have a vendor prefix. >> >> While being there, drop the -mfd suffix

Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] i2c: i2c-cbus-gpio: Add vendor prefix to retu node in example

2017-04-19 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Wolfram, On 04/19/2017 02:51 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> The example contains a device node for a retu device, but >> its compatible string doesn't have a vendor prefix. >> >> While being there, drop the -mfd suffix

Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] i2c: i2c-cbus-gpio: Add vendor prefix to retu node in example

2017-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The example contains a device node for a retu device, but > its compatible string doesn't have a vendor prefix. > > While being there, drop the -mfd suffix since isn't correct. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas

Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] i2c: i2c-cbus-gpio: Add vendor prefix to retu node in example

2017-04-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:27:56PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The example contains a device node for a retu device, but > its compatible string doesn't have a vendor prefix. > > While being there, drop the -mfd suffix since isn't correct. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas

[PATCH v5 5/8] i2c: i2c-cbus-gpio: Add vendor prefix to retu node in example

2017-04-12 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
The example contains a device node for a retu device, but its compatible string doesn't have a vendor prefix. While being there, drop the -mfd suffix since isn't correct. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas Acked-by: Rob Herring Acked-by: Aaro

[PATCH v5 5/8] i2c: i2c-cbus-gpio: Add vendor prefix to retu node in example

2017-04-12 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
The example contains a device node for a retu device, but its compatible string doesn't have a vendor prefix. While being there, drop the -mfd suffix since isn't correct. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas Acked-by: Rob Herring Acked-by: Aaro Koskinen Acked-by: Tony Lindgren ---