Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

or you can take it, >> just let me know. > > I'll be glad to take it, can you send it in a proper format? Most certainly. Done with the title "[PATCH v6 RESEND] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core". Thanks. -- Robert

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

just let me know. > > I'll be glad to take it, can you send it in a proper format? Most certainly. Done with the title "[PATCH v6 RESEND] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core". Thanks. -- Robert

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 05:47:54PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > >>> If so, great, get the platform maintainer to sign off on this please and > >>> then resend it. > > > > If you're talking about the PXA maintainer, then : > > Acked-by: Robert

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 05:47:54PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > >>> If so, great, get the platform maintainer to sign off on this please and > >>> then resend it. > > > > If you're talking about the PXA maintainer, then : > > Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik > > > > I'm

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

Robert Jarzmik writes: >>> If so, great, get the platform maintainer to sign off on this please and >>> then resend it. > > If you're talking about the PXA maintainer, then : > Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik > > I'm happy with the patch, all pxa board

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

Robert Jarzmik writes: >>> If so, great, get the platform maintainer to sign off on this please and >>> then resend it. > > If you're talking about the PXA maintainer, then : > Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik > > I'm happy with the patch, all pxa board maintainers have been warned, and > there >

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

Sergei Ianovich writes: > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 22:22 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 06:15:14PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: >> > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring >> > the same device names and numbers as 8250

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

Sergei Ianovich writes: > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 22:22 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 06:15:14PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: >> > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring >> > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, >>

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 22:22 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 06:15:14PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring > > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, > > it was impossible to use 8250

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 22:22 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 06:15:14PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring > > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, > > it was impossible to use 8250

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 06:15:14PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, > it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. > > Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 06:15:14PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, > it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. > > Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

Heikki Krogerus writes: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 06:15:14PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: >> pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring >> the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, >> it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. >> >> Upon

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 06:15:14PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, > it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. > > Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

Heikki Krogerus writes: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 06:15:14PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: >> pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring >> the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, >> it was impossible to use 8250

Re: [PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 06:15:14PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring > the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, > it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. > > Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned

[PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out to be a clone of 8250_core driver. Workaround for Erratum #19

[PATCH v6] serial: rewrite pxa2xx-uart to use 8250_core

pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result, it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs. Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out to be a clone of 8250_core driver. Workaround for Erratum #19