On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:58:44PM +0100, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> Thanks for the replies!
>
> This should tick the boxes on feedback except for one detail
> on the fixed rate clock:
>
> Moving fixed-clock "ref12" from .dtsi to .dts proved problematic
> for other clocks, this is why ref12 is still
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:58:44PM +0100, Jonas Jensen wrote:
Thanks for the replies!
This should tick the boxes on feedback except for one detail
on the fixed rate clock:
Moving fixed-clock ref12 from .dtsi to .dts proved problematic
for other clocks, this is why ref12 is still in SoC.
Hi Jonas,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:58:44PM +0100, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> Thanks for the replies!
>
> This should tick the boxes on feedback except for one detail
> on the fixed rate clock:
>
> Moving fixed-clock "ref12" from .dtsi to .dts proved problematic
> for other clocks, this is why
Thanks for the replies!
This should tick the boxes on feedback except for one detail
on the fixed rate clock:
Moving fixed-clock "ref12" from .dtsi to .dts proved problematic
for other clocks, this is why ref12 is still in SoC.
My assertion is that "fixed-clock" clocks are probed later when
Thanks for the replies!
This should tick the boxes on feedback except for one detail
on the fixed rate clock:
Moving fixed-clock ref12 from .dtsi to .dts proved problematic
for other clocks, this is why ref12 is still in SoC.
My assertion is that fixed-clock clocks are probed later when
placed
Hi Jonas,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:58:44PM +0100, Jonas Jensen wrote:
Thanks for the replies!
This should tick the boxes on feedback except for one detail
on the fixed rate clock:
Moving fixed-clock ref12 from .dtsi to .dts proved problematic
for other clocks, this is why ref12 is
6 matches
Mail list logo
