Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test without any
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
> >> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
> >> survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
> >
> >
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
So these are
Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
So
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
> >> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
> >> survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
> >
> >
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
Tejun Heo wrote:
Dude, what are you smoking and can I get some? The attached patch is to
trigger the race conditions more easily for verification. Actual fixes
are in the three patches posted as reply to the head
Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
>> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
>> survived ~20 hours of
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
Tejun Heo wrote:
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
Seriously,
Andrew Morton wrote:
>> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
>> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
>> survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
>
> So these are being proposed for 2.6.22?
Yeap.
> I do wonder about
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:01:07 +0900 Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, there are several race conditions around dentry/inode
> reclamation.
>
> a. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_readdir()
>
> b. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_drop_dentry()
>
> c.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:01:07 +0900 Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, there are several race conditions around dentry/inode
reclamation.
a. sysfs_dirent-s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_readdir()
b. sysfs_dirent-s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_drop_dentry()
c.
Andrew Morton wrote:
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
So these are being proposed for 2.6.22?
Yeap.
I do wonder about Rafael's bug
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
Tejun Heo wrote:
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
Seriously,
Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
Tejun Heo wrote:
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
Tejun Heo wrote:
Dude, what are you smoking and can I get some? The attached patch is to
trigger the race conditions more easily for verification. Actual fixes
are in the three patches posted as reply to the head
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
So these are
Hello, all.
Currently, there are several race conditions around dentry/inode
reclamation.
a. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_readdir()
b. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_drop_dentry()
c. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry clearing in sysfs_d_iput()
All aboves are done without
Hello, all.
Currently, there are several race conditions around dentry/inode
reclamation.
a. sysfs_dirent-s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_readdir()
b. sysfs_dirent-s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_drop_dentry()
c. sysfs_dirent-s_dentry clearing in sysfs_d_iput()
All aboves are done without
18 matches
Mail list logo
