Hi Mark,
On 20/02/2014 at 10:12:32 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote :
> NAK. Either this is a atmel,at91rm9200-pinctrl node or a simple-bus. Not
> both; that doesn't make any sense.
>
> >>> Simply a copy paste, I'll fix that here and also the 6 other atmel
> >>> dtsi includes.
> >>>
>
Hi Mark,
On 20/02/2014 at 10:12:32 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote :
NAK. Either this is a atmel,at91rm9200-pinctrl node or a simple-bus. Not
both; that doesn't make any sense.
Simply a copy paste, I'll fix that here and also the 6 other atmel
dtsi includes.
What is your preference for
On 20/02/2014 09:59, Boris BREZILLON :
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 19/02/2014 18:54, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 05:31:42PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>> On 19/02/2014 at 17:00:20 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 19/02/2014 18:54, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 05:31:42PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 19/02/2014 at 17:00:20 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
On 19/02/2014 18:10, Boris BREZILLON :
> On 19/02/2014 17:19, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
>> Hi boris,
>>
>> I don't know if splitting the patch is needed.
>
>> For the 9261 I was
>> asked to keep the patch number low
> Okay, but then you mix DT modifications with source code modification.
>
>
Hi Mark,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 05:00:20PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > + adc0: adc@fffd {
> > + compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-adc";
> > + reg = <0xfffd 0x100>;
> > +
Hi Mark,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 05:00:20PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
+ adc0: adc@fffd {
+ compatible = atmel,at91sam9260-adc;
+ reg = 0xfffd 0x100;
+ interrupts = 20
On 19/02/2014 18:10, Boris BREZILLON :
On 19/02/2014 17:19, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
Hi boris,
I don't know if splitting the patch is needed.
For the 9261 I was
asked to keep the patch number low
Okay, but then you mix DT modifications with source code modification.
IMHO, we should
Hi Mark,
On 19/02/2014 18:54, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 05:31:42PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 19/02/2014 at 17:00:20 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
On 20/02/2014 09:59, Boris BREZILLON :
Hi Mark,
On 19/02/2014 18:54, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 05:31:42PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 19/02/2014 at 17:00:20 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
This adds
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 05:31:42PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 19/02/2014 at 17:00:20 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni
Hi Mark,
On 19/02/2014 18:00, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi | 628 ++
On 19/02/2014 at 17:00:20 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi | 628
> >
On 19/02/2014 17:19, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
Hi boris,
I don't know if splitting the patch is needed.
For the 9261 I was
asked to keep the patch number low
Okay, but then you mix DT modifications with source code modification.
IMHO, we should keep these modifications in different
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi | 628
> ++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c | 16 +
>
Hi Alexandre,
On 19/02/2014 16:32, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi | 628 ++
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c | 16 +
2 files changed,
Hi boris,
I don't know if splitting the patch is needed. For the 9261 I was
asked to keep the patch number low and the board won't boot up if the
one of the 2 patches is missing.
Jean-Jacques
2014-02-19 17:01 GMT+01:00 Boris BREZILLON :
> Hi Alexandre,
>
>
> On 19/02/2014 16:32, Alexandre
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi | 628 ++
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c | 16 +
2 files changed, 644 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi | 628 ++
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c | 16 +
2 files changed, 644 insertions(+)
create
Hi boris,
I don't know if splitting the patch is needed. For the 9261 I was
asked to keep the patch number low and the board won't boot up if the
one of the 2 patches is missing.
Jean-Jacques
2014-02-19 17:01 GMT+01:00 Boris BREZILLON b.brezil...@overkiz.com:
Hi Alexandre,
On 19/02/2014
Hi Alexandre,
On 19/02/2014 16:32, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi | 628 ++
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi | 628
++
On 19/02/2014 17:19, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
Hi boris,
I don't know if splitting the patch is needed.
For the 9261 I was
asked to keep the patch number low
Okay, but then you mix DT modifications with source code modification.
IMHO, we should keep these modifications in different
On 19/02/2014 at 17:00:20 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi |
Hi Mark,
On 19/02/2014 18:00, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi | 628
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 05:31:42PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 19/02/2014 at 17:00:20 +, Mark Rutland wrote :
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
This adds preliminary DT support for the at91sam9rl.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni
26 matches
Mail list logo
